A training manual outlining the structured Coordinate Remote Viewing protocols developed within U.S. military research programs.

Remote Viewing: The Complete User’s Manual for Coordinate Remote Viewing

David Morehouse
2007–2011 editions (drawing on 1990s military training protocols)
A procedural manual outlining the structured methodology known as Coordinate Remote Viewing (CRV), originally developed within U.S. military and intelligence research programs during the Cold War. David Morehouse presents staged exercises, terminology, session structure, and controlled protocols intended to train individuals to describe targets beyond ordinary sensory access. The book emphasizes disciplined recording of impressions, separation of analytical overlay from raw perception, and adherence to defined phases of data acquisition. Positioned as both instructional guide and historical account, the text situates CRV within the broader context of U.S. government research into anomalous cognition.
“Remote Viewing was created as a means of gathering information, but it has proven to be much more.”
Coordinate Remote Viewing (CRV) emerged from U.S. defense-funded research beginning in the 1970s, conducted primarily at Stanford Research Institute (SRI) and later managed under various intelligence agencies, including the Defense Intelligence Agency. The program was eventually consolidated under what became publicly known as Project Stargate. In 1995, portions of the program were declassified. A CIA-commissioned evaluation concluded that while some laboratory results appeared statistically suggestive, the data was inconsistent and insufficient for reliable intelligence application. Funding was subsequently discontinued. Some former participants, including David Morehouse, have described internal resistance, reputational concerns, and active efforts to distance agencies from the program prior to public disclosure. These accounts include claims of deliberate suppression or discrediting efforts. However, such claims are based on personal testimony and are not corroborated by declassified government records. Following declassification, official positioning framed the research as inconclusive.